The controversial driver protection device became mandatory in F1 and Formula 2 this year, and played a significant role in major accidents in both championships.

Wolff said at the start of the season that he was not impressed by the device, which was forced through by the on safety grounds despite opposition from teams, and joked he would take it off with a chainsaw if he could.

This week an FIA report revealed that the halo prevented from being struck on the visor by ’s front wing endplate in their scary first-corner crash at the .

“Yes, I have changed my mind,” said Wolff when asked by Motorsport.com about his comments at the ’s end-of-season prizegiving ceremony in Russia.

“I still don’t like the aesthetics of it, and I hope we can find a solution in the future that looks good.

“[But] I really like Charles, he’s a young, upcoming racer that deserves to be in Formula 1 and I would not have forgiven myself if we would have voted against the halo and it would have failed, and we’d have had a severe incident with a potentially catastrophic outcome.

“So, even though it’s aesthetically not what I like it’s a super initiative that has shown its merit.

“I’m happy that Jean [Todt, president] pushed through and they didn’t give me a chainsaw at the beginning of the season.”

The halo will remain part of F1 for the foreseeable future after its successful first season as a mandated safety device.

However, motorsport’s ongoing safety push means F1’s time as an open-cockpit category may be numbered.

“We need to get the right balance between aesthetics and safety,” Wolff said when asked if he preferred F1 to be open-cockpit. “I personally like the closed canopies like fighter jets.

“Between the teams and the and the commercial rights holder, we just need to work proactively and in a collaborative manner to find solutions that look great and save lives.”

Tyre marks on Charles Leclerc's Halo and chassis, Sauber

Tyre marks on ’s Halo and chassis,

Photo by: