Manchester City forward Raheem Sterling and international said he suffered racial abuse from Chelsea fans.

Chelsea and Authorities say they are investigating the abuse that is racist that is alleged and four fans have been suspended by the team. The Premier League says anybody found to have been abusive deserves to be punished.

However, may be Mr Sterling symptomatic of football-related racism’s alleged misuse getting worse?

Regrettably, it’s very tough to assess the scale of the issue with statistics.

Kick it Out, a football equality charity, recommends yearly statistics based on reports of discrimination it’s received over the previous 12 months. Reports can come from the Premier League, from all stages of the game down to grassroots football.

Its report demonstrated there were 520 episodes in the 2017 18 seasonup from 469 in 2016-17.

Most of these reports (53 percent ) were about racism.

The data is primarily based on reports which both players and audiences submit into the Kick It Out web site.

The situation with this procedure – that Kick Out It acknowledges – is it is not possible to say whether there’s been a genuine increase in misuse or folks have just become more likely to examine it.

Where else can we turn to for data?

The Home Office provides statistics on football-related arrests from England and Wales. It indicates that for racist and indecent chanting last season, 1-5 arrests were out of the arrests.

It’s down from the peak of 44 arrests at 2010 11, while that is more than double the arrests in 2016 17 season.

However, these figures reveal how many individuals were detained and never the number of racist incidents.

A football banning order is available to the courts and police forces to stop individuals from attending matches. By 1 there were 1,822 such banning orders inforce – a fall of 43 percent since 2011.

However, the Home Office told BBC News of the current football banning orders related to racism.

Clubs may also take action contrary to supporters which participate in stereotypical behaviour. After four buffs refused to allow a black man on into the Paris subway in 2015, Chelsea prohibited them from attending any one of their club’s matches for lifetime.

The Premier League was asked by BBC Reality Check what requirements – if any – were placed to keep and what action was obtained.

It told me that whilst all nightclubs could keep allegations made in their earth, or their own records on banning orders, the data is not collected centrally.

‘1 / 2 fans’ watching racism

While racism in football still persists, it’s dropped a whole great deal because the 1980s – based to Prof Ellis Cashmore, expert and a sociologist at football racism, in Aston University:

“Now’s racism is nowhere near the degree of the 1980s also it’s extraordinary it clings to this game given it’s so diverse.

“In football there seems to become considered a preservation of a racist tradition,” he says.

As more players from abroad were recruited by English clubs racist abuse, he says, started to be common in the 1990s – however, the problem resurfaced from the early 2000s.

In 2011,” Luis Suarez has been prohibited for eight games after being found guilty, by the FA, of abusing Patrice Evra (allegations that Suarez denied).

Because players felt empowered after that to talk against discrimination that episode, according to Prof Cashmore, had been a turning point.

But, he says, pockets of racism exist.

In 2014,” a study between 2,500 football fans that were anonymous to try and unearth attitudes towards racism was completed by Prof Cashmore.

It discovered that half of all fans watched or experienced some form of racism.

1 person who responded to the survey said that while racism may nolonger be vocal as it had been”anybody who shopped soccer frequently will confirm racist undertones are still there and quite living”.

What do you would like BBC Reality Check to investigate? Contact

Read from Reality-check

Follow us on Twitter

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here