Premiership Rugby won’t release non-English players to worldcup decks annually unless World Rugby affects its”deceptive and unfair” insurance rules.
The nightclubs have been objecting to certain restrictions over pay outs when players have been injured on international duty.
As it stands out England-based Scotland and Wales players will soon be not able to join their national squads until mid-August.
“We all are seeking is the exact same type of platform which exists in football,” explained Premiership boss Mark McCafferty.
“Should people release players for international duty and they are injured on international duty, then a international game should bear the accountability for that.
£225,000 and 12-month limit
World Rugby Regulation 9 means nightclubs are simply able to discharge players at mid-August.
But most international sides will have training camps all through the summer before warmup fits in August. Wales have a training camp in Switzerland in July.
“We will let the players go of course to the worldcup in accordance to Regulation 9, however, we are not going to go beyond Regulation 9 when we’re mistreated in the system broadly speaking,” McCafferty said.
Current World Rugby regulations mean nightclubs have been paid a maximum of £225,000 when a new player is injured on international duty, even when their salary exceeds that amount, while the insurance only covers a 12-month interval.
McCafferty states that the clubs are well prepared to be flexible with player discharge, but only when these restrictions are raised.
The insurance policies of both British and Irish Lions and the Barbarians covers the club for the complete amount of accountability when a new player is injured.
“There are limits [World Rugby] put either on the salary of this player [£225,000] – and there are a great deal of players above that salary – or the term of this injury [12 weeks ],” McCafferty said.
“Those sort of limitations, we think, are unfair and false.
“When a new player is getting Xthen that is his cost into the club, or when he is off for longer than a calendar year, then a liability should be covered. That’s what is present in football, that’s what the Lions pay for all of us once the players are out on a Lions tour, it’s just what the Barbarians do as well.
“So we don’t know why there should be any difference regarding World Rugby.
“We could be elastic, but the limitations have to be raised, as it isn’t reasonable for a golf club have to pick up that sort of cost liability when a player was injured on international duty. There’s absolutely no logic in that.”
Wales and Northampton fly half Dan Biggar, who’d be on the list of players affected if the problem isn’t resolved, told BBC Wales Sport:”Hopefully a little good sense will prevail and obviously I need to be involved in all that’s on the schedule.”