LOS ANGELES — The California State Athletic Commission (CSAC) held a licensing hearing Jon Jones on Dec. 11.
Jones’ license was awarded back in the hearing at Sacramento, Calif., later it was reversed in February following a positive drug test in July 2017 for a prohibited steroid metabolite. The license which was awarded at the hearing is what’s allowing Jones to fight alexandergustafsson for the UFC light heavyweight title in the most important event of UFC 232 on Saturday at Inglewood, Calif..
The adverse findings were for trace quantities of a long term metabolite of their steroid Turinabol, the same person he tested positive for last year. USADA is your UFC’s anti-doping partner.
“however , they didn’t,” Novitzky said when asked if CSAC knew Dec. 11. I’m definitely a proponent in as much transparency as you can. Unfortunately, how you think of each and every scenario? I think in USADA’therefore mind, they had no obligation to let Nevada understand about it at all. I think out of the abundance of caution, they achieved it. Can they will have contributed it to [CSAC] as well? I think potentially. ”
Foster confirmed with MMA Fighting on Friday which CSAC had no knowledge of these adverse findings before last week.
The Nevada commission had been told of these findings in early December because Jones was initially scheduled to fight with Gustafsson at Las Vegas, Novitzky explained. Jones also had four tests come back clean between September and November, Novitzky said over the Rogan series. Ever since that time, an example collection in Dec. 9, came back together with traces of the M 3 metabolite of Turinabol back again. Novitzky has described the occurrence of some medication evaluations coming back others and clean coming back adverse as “pulsing,” because of the relatively modest amount of the metabolite in Jones’ system.
After return that Dec. 9 test and based on analyzing the last 18 months of Jones drug test results, the Nevada Athletic Commission (NAC) said last Sunday that it would not let Jones compete this coming weekend, pending a hearing to find out more info. The NAC allowed Jones to draw his own license application and then he ’ll need to go in front of the commission for a hearing .
Together with Nevada unwilling to let Jones punctually, the UFC contacted Foster along with CSAC, who’d already granted Jones a license Dec. 11. Predicated on the phrase of scientists, pros and USADA,” Foster has said he considers the science things to Jones being sterile and also the metabolite in his machine being the same one from July 2017 — the main one he was already punished . Jones was suspended 15 months in his USADA case for this breach.
Therefore, with CSAC Onboard to keep Jones in the fight, the UFC uprooted the entire UFC 232 occasion and proceeded it from Las Vegas into the LosAngeles Region.
The Nevada commission was first told in early December and also didn’t even get back the final Dec. 9 result until last week. When asked if USADA would have or should have told the Nevada commission early in the day, after the August and September findings, Novitzky said USADA was still investigating and exercising caution with respect to due process.
“How USADA adjudicates the program is how that they ’re very alert to their equity and due process afforded the athletes,” Novitzky explained. “I require a great deal of pride because. I state this very often that with a strong, detailed program is critical, but as important will be fair and having due process afforded to the athletes. So I think in their idea, if they informed Nevada of the straight away, once they’d an inkling that, ” & lsquo;yet, maybe that is a concern, a remnant difficulty, maybe not just a subsequent breach,’ they’Id obtained Id be cautious, as a commission could return on their own and make use of the negatively contrary to the athlete.
“Again, ideally, could we now have enjoyed to have it? Yes. However, they reaching out to most of the pros and took a great deal of care and vetting the issues out there. And again, I think they did the right thing. ”