He was subsequently promoted into a task as complete technical leader in mid-2016 as part of a reform designed by then-president and CEO Sergio Marchionne.
You’ve must let him be described as a technical manager.
“This is a fulltime job, seven days each week. It’s not just a part time item. That is going to dilute their technical endeavor to get sure.
“I believe that it’s the wrong choice. They should have brought someone else in.”
It is unclear who’ll replace Binotto as thoughts of Ferrari’s technical section, but there are hints the team may decide to simply hand responsibility to aero chief Enrico Cardile and mind of its engine department Corrado Iotti.
Anderson said:”I don’t see why you would choose your absolute best technical man …and put him at a direction, political position that just isn’t his forte. Why could you do this?”
Binotto has been credited with using a relaxing effect over the departments he has been responsible for at Maranello, while Arrivabene was accused of creating a civilization of pointing fingers when matters went wrong.
Anderson said that”you need ton’t have a blame culture, but somebody’s responsible and also you have to be certain you reevaluate why it neglected and strengthen it” — and that it won’t matter whether Ferrari’s team works better, in case Binotto’s move means the vehicle is slower.
He added:”You can easily throw away two or three tenths of an additional in the motor vehicle and you’re scraping to get up there, be competitive and make all the ideal decisions”
Anderson also cautioned that would fundamentally cost it self a prize technical advantage having its own policy of kicking under performing team bosses out.
He said:”What happens by the conclusion of 20-19 if Crimson Bull steps between them and suddenly Ferrari are fourth or third in the tournament? It may happen. [Afterward ] his mind’s gont roll.
“They might drop a very good advantage because they put him in a position he really should not maintain.”