Rafael Nadal has warned players intent on ousting the head of their ATP that changing the president will”stop the procedure for improving the activity”.
A vote on Briton Chris Kermode’s future is due to take place.
The 54-year-old’s 2nd three-year term expires by the close of the year.
To procure a fresh word, Kermode needs the support of participant and tournament agents, but a few influential players are seeking for change.
However, 17-time Grand Slam winner Nadal’s opinion is that shift right now would be counterproductive.
“I believe in longterm projects,” the 32-year-old Spaniard told a group of reporters at Indian Wells.
“I am not a very big fan of shifting things frequently. I really think there’s a great deal of things to do – we will need to sign up a contract to get its World Tour Finals, also there exists a new ATP Cup.
“If you change, you proceed through a procedure. A new president needs the time make a team and to understand all of the things, so in my estimation shifting the president will block the procedure for improving our game.
“I believe Chris did a fantastic job. He’s a fantastic guy, who did good stuff for our game and it would be useful if he stays for some time .”
The ATP board is composed of three championship agents, and three player brokers. Kermode will require the aid of two each to stay in their own post.
The player agents are most likely to be heavily influenced by their ATP Player Council, which met under the presidency of world numberone Novak Djokovic on Tuesday’s deliberations.
Sources suggest Kermode will not enjoy their majority support and that player agents are enthusiastic to vote contrary to an extension of his contract.
Supporters of Kermode point to new events just such as the Next Gen ATP Finals, in addition to increases in retirement contributions and prize money.
One of the critics is Canadian player Vasek Pospisil. The world number 11-4 at the Open composed a letter to fellow players which wound in the public domain and is an associate of this ball player Council.
He asserts players can not receive nearly enough of the revenue.
“We want a CEO that first of all represents OUR interests,” he also wrote.
“We need a structure that prevents sway exerted by the deep-pocketed tournaments. Simply speaking, we must start acting and running such as a company, in contrast to a lot of kids that are fearful.”