investigators want to be banned from the for a season if they are found guilty of breaking financial rules.

However, according to one well-placed source, a final decision is yet to be made by chief investigator Yves Leterme.

The former Belgium prime minister, chairman of the investigatory panel of ’s independent financial control board, is set to make a recommendation this week.

With no vote in such cases, the final say lies with him but several of his colleagues are understood to have firmly expressed the view at a recent meeting that a season-long ban would be a suitable punishment if City are found guilty.

Manchester City

Leterme and his team have been looking at evidence first uncovered in a series of leaks published by the German newspaper last year.

The reports alleged that had broken Financial Fair Play regulations by iating the value of a multimillion-pound sponsorship deal. City were fined £49m in 2014 for a previous breach of regulations.

The champions denied any wrongdoing, and said it could not comment on an ongoing investigation, but according to the New York Times, investigators now want rules upheld and punished with a ban.

’s adjudicatory chamber would have to decide whether it agreed with any recommendation from Leterme – expected in the next 48 hours – although it is unlikely to apply to next season’s competition because City could appeal, and even take their case to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

But it would still be a major blow for a club desperate to win ’s most prestigious club competition for the first time, and who could also soon face a transfer ban, with the FA, and Fifa also currently investigating City over their signing of youth players.

Earlier this season, a statement from said: “The accusation of financial irregularities is entirely false.

welcomes the opening of a formal investigation as an opportunity to bring to an end the speculation resulting from the illegal hacking and out of context publication of City emails.

“The club’s published accounts are full and complete and a matter of legal and regulatory record.”